Legal Opinion

City of Camden v. Green

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 18 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

In accordance with the provisions of “An act to establish an excise department in cities of this state,” passed April 8th, 1884, and its supplements (Rev. Sup., p. 695), a *592board of excise commissioners was organized in the city of Camden, and thereby became vested with the power to make,, establish, amend or repeal ordinances and by-laws to license, regulate or prohibit inns and taverns, restaurants and beer saloons within the city, but the fees for licenses granted by the board were to go into the city treasury.

By ordinance passed April 9th,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flower v. . LanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Town of Ligonier v. AckermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Custin v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Emery v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Sowles v. SouleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re an Increase in Fees by the New Jersey State Board of DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Continental Trailways, Inc. v. Director, Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. Rickenbach v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
  4. Automatic Merchandising Council v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  5. Yardville Estates, Inc. v. City of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API