Legal Opinion
Doe v. Baylor Univ.
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided September 29, 2018No. 6:17-CV-236-RPPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Each of the four plaintiffs in this case allege that while they were students at Baylor University they were sexually assaulted by another student, but when they sought assistance and protection from Baylor, the school did nothing (or almost nothing) in response to their reports. Plaintiffs allege that Baylor's failure to promptly and appropriately investigate and respond to student sexual assaults substantially increased the risk of sexual assault for Plaintiffs and for all female students at Baylor. They further allege that Baylor's own policies…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Daniel Pena v. Cliff Viessman, Inc. and John DoeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2026
- Doe 1 v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Doe 1 v. The Curators of the University of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
- Doe v. Morehouse College, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022
- Doe v. Texas A&M UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.