Legal Opinion

Anniston Nat. Bank v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 12, 1931No. 7 Div. 999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Bill by appellee to foreclose a mortgage executed by the Woodstock Cotton Mills. Appellant, Anniston National Bank, had been appointed trustee for the uses and purposes of the mortgage instrument, viz., to secure appellant and other creditors of the cotton mills in the payment of their debts. According to the bill the mortgage bonds, representing the indebtednesses due to all other creditors— not including, however, the bonds held and owned by the bank — had passed into the ownership of appellee who had succeeded the bank as trustee for the mortgage bond holders. Appellant bank was made a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McArthur v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Culley v. ElfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Shackelford v. BullockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jacobs v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API