Legal Opinion

Yager v. Ring

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided November 23, 1901No. 329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Plea in Abatement. Another action pending for the same cause. Plea allowed; suit stayed.

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, District Judge.

This suit is brought by the plaintiffs to recover from the defendant the sum of $6o,-ooo damages for an alleged trespass in forcibly entering upon placer mining claim No. 7 on Gold Run, and extracting and appropriating gold dust therefrom of that value, belonging to plaintiffs. It is alleged in the complaint that Yager located the claim on or about July i, 1900, complied with the law in the matter of staking and recording, and “after the location of said placer claim” by Yager conveyed certain interests therein to the other plaintiffs, no date being given. It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crane v. LarsenOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Shoenberger v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sakow v. J. E. Riley Inv. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1939
  2. State ex rel. Green Mountain Lumber Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. G.M. Lum. Co. v. Sup'r Ct.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API