Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. G.M. Lum. Co. v. Sup'r Ct.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1927No. 20692. En BancPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING.

After the decision in this case, reported in 144 Wn. 351,258 P. 27, a rehearing was granted. The question involved, as may be seen from the statement in the opinion of the Department, relates to a plea in abatement, filed in a general mortgage foreclosure action in Snohomish county, covering property in that county, on account of a former action, pending in King county, wherein the mortgagor, as plaintiff, seeks performance by the mortgagee or that the mortgage be canceled.

The former opinion proceeds upon the theory that the relator has an ample and adequate remedy by appeal, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Martin v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. McMaster v. Advance Thresher Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. McLeod v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Emry v. . ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Nesbitt v. Pioche Consolidated Mining & Reduction Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1894

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API