Legal Opinion
Bash v. Howald
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 11, 1916No. 6699PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from District Court, Garfield County ; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by William Howald against J. H. Bash and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BLEAKMORE, C.
This is an action for damages, commenced in the district court of Kingfisher county by the defendant in error, as plaintiff, against the Iilaintiffs in error, as defendants, on an attachment bond, the condition of which was to pay all damages sustained by reason of .the attachment if the order be wrongfully obtained. The parties are referred to as they appeared below. It is alleged in the petition:
“That the plaintiff is now, and at all times hereinafter mentioned was, engaged in the business of a retail merchant in the city of Hennessey, in Kingfisher county, Oklahoma…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hirsh v. TwyfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Gonzales v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Hoge v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Modern Woodmen of America v. TerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Oklahoma Land Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- McClanahan v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949