Legal Opinion
Snell v. Department of Professional Regulation
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 26, 2001No. 4-99-0876PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff, Joseph Snell, a licensed chiropractor, appeals from a September 1999 circuit court order affirming sanctions imposed against him by defendants, the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation (Department) and its then-director, Nikki M. Zollar, based on Snell’s violation of section 26 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (Act) (225 ILCS 60/26 (West Supp. 1999)). Snell argues that (1) the Department’s decision was against the manifest weight of the evidence; and (2) section 26, as applied to him, violates his first…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vuagniaux v. Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2002
- Snell v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2002
- Vuagniaux v. Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.