Legal Opinion

Vuagniaux v. Department of Professional Regulation

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2003No. 94073 RelPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

Docket No. 94073–Agenda 8–May 2003.

THAD VUAGNIAUX, Appellee, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION et al. , Appellants.

Opinion filed November 20, 2003.

2Opinion of the Court · RarickJustice Rarick

Dr. Thad Vuagniaux, a licensed chiropractic physician, was reprimanded by the Department of Professional Regulation (the Department) and fined the sum of $2,500 for violating the advertising provisions set forth in section 26 of the Medical Practice Act of 1987 (225 ILCS 60/26 (West 1998)). On administrative review of the Department’s decision, the circuit court of Madison County reversed. In so doing, it found various sections of the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Posadas De Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Co. of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API