Legal Opinion

Daum v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 9, 1951No. 48715PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitakee, Judge

■ Plaintiff entered into a contract with the United States wherein plaintiff agreed to construct two large hangars and certain auxiliary buildings at Muroc Army Airfield, California. The Government agreed to furnish the entire amount of structural steel and certain fixtures necessary for the construction of the two hangars. The contract was awarded June 30, .1944, and provided that the contractor was to commence work one day after the award. In recognition of the difficulties of wartime construction, the contract carried no liquidated damage clause for failure to finish the work within the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Commerce International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Barling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Barling v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  5. Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API