Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Angelo Todesca Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 2006Published

1DissentCordy, J.

(dissenting, with whom Marshall, C.J., and Cowin, *144J., join). Officer Erickson’s death was the result of a horrible and regrettable accident. However, “the mere happening of [an] accident [does] not warrant a finding of negligence.” Zarrillo v. Stone, 317 Mass. 510, 512 (1945). I agree with the Appeals Court that the evidence at the criminal trial was insufficient to establish that Brian Gauthier operated his truck negligently, in violation of the motor vehicle homicide statute, thereby causing the officer’s death.1 See Commonwealth v. Angelo Todesca Corp., 62 Mass. App. Ct. 599, 607-608…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhoadesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Goldstein v. GontarzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Stevens v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Capano v. MelchionnoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. Commonwealth v. ArmandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API