Muse Collections, Inc. v. Carissima Bijoux, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Personal jurisdiction over a particular defendant can be conferred under CPLR 302 (a) (1) “even where that defendant has never physically entered the state, 'so long as the defendant’s activities [in New York] were purposeful and there is a substantial relationship between the transaction and the claim asserted’ ” (Kaprall v WE: Women’s Entertainment, LLC, 74 AD3d 1151, 1153 [2010] [citation omitted], quoting Kreutter v McFadden Oil Corp., 71 NY2d 460, 467 [1988]). Here, however, the Supreme Court properly determined that the number, nature, and quality of the contacts with New York by the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- LaMarca v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ingraham v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Grimaldi v. GuinnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- O'Brien v. Hackensack University Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Daniel B. Katz & Associates Corp. v. Midland Rushmore, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Mejia-Haffner v. Killington, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Shatara v. EphraimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Jacobs v. 201 Stephenson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Shatara v. EphraimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.