Legal Opinion

Cox v. Paul

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2005No. 71S03-0409-CV-417PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that a health care provider who receives notice of possible dangerous side effects of a treatment is not strictly liable for failure to warn a patient who received the treatment from the provider, but may be held liable for failure to make reasonable efforts to warn the patient. If there is credible evidence that the patient did not receive notice, it is the burden of the provider to establish that reasonable steps were taken. In this case, the provider did not carry that burden.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1983, Suzan Cox consulted Dr. William Paul, an oral and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stropes Ex Rel. Taylor v. Heritage House Childrens Center of Shelbyville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hoffman v. E.W. Bliss Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Harris v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cox v. PaulIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Cox v. PaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Morejon v. Rais Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Chi Yun Ho v. FryeIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Coppolillo v. CortIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Wanda Denson v. The Estate of Delmer Dillard and Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Gipson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API