Legal Opinion

Eckhardt v. Judevine

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

This case is a companion case to Eckhardt v. Judevine, ante, p. 168, 288 N. W. 756, and involves substantially the same state of facts. The principal .question of law in this case is the same as that considered in the companion case. The findings of the trial court are clearly in accordance with the weight of the evidence.

However, on a motion to review, the plaintiffs seek to have the judgment modified to impose a trust on the entire Wilder tavern property. Upon motion the trial court modified the judgment so as to establish a trust upon the Wilder tavern property to the extent of $500 only.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bromley v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Eckhardt v. JudevineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API