Pinkston v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Garrard, J.-
The appellant, Pinkston, was convicted of the unlawful sale of narcotics (heroin) in a trial to the court. The sole error assigned is that the court erred in denying a motion *634for a directed finding made at the conclusion of the state’s case in chief.
The trial court denied the motion and Pinkston elected to proceed with the presentation of her evidence. At the conclusion of all the evidence no effort was made to renew the motion. The motion to correct errors and Pinkston’s argument on appeal do not assert that the decision was not sustained by the evidence or was contrary to law.
We…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. VerzeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Hoosier Insurance Company v. OgleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- McDaniels v. McDanielsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
- Dowell v. JollyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
- Delphos Hoop Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Winston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Murphy v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Martin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rose v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Marriage of Poret v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.