Legal Opinion

Smith v. Heissinger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 6, 2001No. 4 — 00—0571PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

In October 1999, plaintiff, Michael Smith, filed a two-count complaint against defendants, Matt Heissinger and Regina Gae Buie-Heissinger, requesting the trial court to declare the easement rights possessed by plaintiff in a 25-foot-wide right-of-way over defendants’ properties included the right to place underground utilities for the benefit of plaintiffs property. After an April 2000 bench trial, the trial court found plaintiff had an easement by necessity over defendants’ properties for utilities and issued a permanent injunction enjoining defendants from interfering with plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Toombs v. City of ChampaignAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. McMahon v. HinesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. SofferAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Bond v. DunmireAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. Granite Properties Ltd. Partnership v. MannsIllinois Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Anoush Cab, Inc. v. Uber Tech. Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Cable America, Inc. v. Pace Electronics, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. River's Edge Homeowners' Ass'n v. City of NapervilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Regan v. Pomerleau, DeForest Realty, Inc. and City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. Tomecek v. BavasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API