Legal Opinion
Raphael v. Viojon Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGavagae, J.
A group of apartment house tenants brought this action against the landlord asking for a variety of equitable relief. In view of all the evidence, the only relief that can possibly be granted, is to compel the landlord to maintain doorman service.
When the leases were executed, doorman service was regularly supplied. The leases themselves are silent as to its continuance or cessation. In these circumstances, temporary injunctions *230have been granted. (Freeman v. 103 Fast 86th St. Realty Corp., 196 Misc. 297; Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp., 196 Misc. 303.) Except for the procedural stage at which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Phillips v. Hilmont Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
- Norlil Realty Corp. v. TolchinskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
- Lenox Hill Apartments, Inc. v. GoldsteinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944
- Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
- Eidelsberg v. Borchard Affiliations, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Richman v. FleisherNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1949