Legal Opinion

Marks v. Goldhorn Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.

Motion for a temporary injunction is granted to the extent that the defendant will be required to furnish eight-hour doorman service which it concedes was furnished in the past. It is denied as premature insofar as it seeks to require the defendant to supply elevator operator service without prejudice to renewal if it appears that the defendant actually does discontinue such service. The motion is otherwise denied (Goldberg v. Grant, N. Y. L. J., Nov. 4, 1948, p. 1032, col. 6, mod. 274 App. Div. 993). The cause will be preferred and set at the head of the Ready Calendar of Special Term, Part…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Hilmont Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Raphael v. Viojon Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API