Legal Opinion

Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Ferrell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. James E. Cobb. Tlie nature of the case, and the facts disclosed by the evidence are sufficiently stated in the opinion. At the written request of the plaintiff, Ferrell, the court charged the jury that if they believed all the evidence, they must find the issue in favor of the plaintiff, and the horse in controversy liable to the satisfaction of his execution.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. James E. Cobb. Tlie nature of the case, and the facts disclosed by the evidence are sufficiently stated in the opinion. At the written request of the plaintiff, Ferrell, the court charged the jury that if they believed all the evidence, they must find the issue in favor of the plaintiff, and the horse in controversy liable to the satisfaction of his execution. To this charge the claimants, Lehman, Durr & Co., excepted, and here assign the same as error.

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J

The single question raised by the record, and to which the arguments of counsel are directed, is, whether or not the lien given by the act of 1880-81, approved December 8th, 1880 (Acts 188Ó-81, p. 260), entitled “ An act to prohibit the owner of. any horse, mule, ass, cow, hog, sheep, or goat, from allowing any such animal to go at large off the premises of such owner in Montgomery county, except certain portions enumerated and defined herein, and to prescribe a rule of damages, and rules of practice in cases arising under this act,” is superior to, and overrides the lien of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. SpenceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  2. Coster's Ex'rs v. Bank of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. Morris v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  4. O'Rourke v. O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Churchill v. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parker-Harris Co. v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Goff v. Byers Bros. & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API