Legal Opinion
National Automobile Dealers Association v. Federal Trade Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 22, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1711PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
The National Automobile Dealers Association (“NADA”) challenges the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC” or “Agency”) interpretation of the meaning of “uses a consumer report” in the amended Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681m(h). As set forth in a preamble to amended regulations related to “risk-based pricing” of consumer credit, the FTC contends that an automobile dealer that does not obtain a consumer report nonetheless “uses” it when the dealer executes a credit contract based upon a third-party financing source’s use of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals Lp v. Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Depomed, Inc. v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Henderson v. Corelogic National Background Data, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Henderson v. Corelogic National Background Data, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022