Legal Opinion

Goldwater v. Nitzberg

New York City Court

Decided December 8, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Motions to dismiss complaint on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action and on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action.

Although somewhat inartistically drawn, the complaint sufficiently alleges that one Grimes was treated at a city hospital for injuries received in an accident, and that said Grimes executed an assignment to the hospital of any moneys which might be recovered from the party liable for Grimes’ injuries up to the amount of the hospital bill of $103.50; that Grimes retained the defendant as his attorney in connection vsith…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Superior Brassiere Co. v. ZimetbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Corn Exchange Bank v. GrossAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American East India Corp. v. Ideal Shoe Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc. v. Town & Country Mutual InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Midtown Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Brinkman v. MoskowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1962
  5. Methodist Hosp. v. T. & C. MUT. INS. CO.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API