Legal Opinion

Midtown Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 30, 2004No. 49A02-0312-CV-1047PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge. ©

Midtown Chiropractic appeals a summary judgment for Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. Midtown raises two issues on appeal, which we restate as:

1. Whether an assignment to a health care provider of an accident victim's right to proceeds from a claim for damages is a valid equitable assignment or an invalid assignment of a personal injury claim; and

2. Whether a health care provider may bring a direct action against an insurer when the insurer settles with the accident victim but does not honor the accident victim's assignment of his right to the settlement proceeds. ~

We reverse…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. First of Georgia InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Hernandez v. Suburban Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Structo Division, King Seeley Thermos Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Whitehaven S.F., LLC v. SpanglerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Midtown Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Midtown Chiropractic v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API