Legal Opinion

Castle v. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

This was ejectment by Ai and Castle, trustee. At tbe close *62of the plaintiffs’ case, Ai was non-suited. At the close of the ■evidence the court on motion directed a verdict for the defendant “on the ground that the evidence shows an estoppel by former judgment,” to which ruling the plaintiff excepted.

The former judgment was in an action of ejectment for the land claimed in this case brought by the present defendant against Castle and Weaver and Iloogs. The defendant, Castle, filed a general denial, but the defendants, AYeaver and Iloogs, Castle’s tenants,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Castle v. . NoyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  4. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Campania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Burns v. GavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hewahewa v. LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Tibbetts v. DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API