Legal Opinion

Beyer v. Miller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1951No. 982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment

for damages to a Plymouth automobile, which was being operated by one Lindner, sustained when it collided with an automobile operated by the defendant.

The defendant brought this appeal, urging two grounds for the reversal of the judgment.

The first ground is that there was no substantial evidence of negligence on his part, or, if there was such evidence, the evidence to the contrary was such as to make the verdict manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

We have read and analyzed the evidence in order to reach a decision on this issue. It is true that in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mielke v. LeebersonOhio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. HardySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Cammile v. SandersonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
  3. Upper Arlington v. WissingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Zoloto v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Drown v. Hill (In Re Phillips)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API