Vasek v. Warren Grain & Seed Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
Henry and Ronald Vasek, d/b/a Vasek Farms, appeal an order dismissing with prejudice their complaint against Cargill. The Vaseks contend that the trial court could not hold as a matter of law that the statutes of limitations had run and that Gary Hill of Warren Grain was not Car-gill’s agent for service of process on February 22, 1978. We affirm.
FACTS
The Vaseks contracted to sell seed to Warren Grain & Seed. They delivered seed in late 1976 and early 1977. Henry Vasek heard that checks being drawn by Warren Grain were not being paid. He knew of a business relationship…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Taylor v. Granite State Provident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- A. Gay Jenson Farms Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Derrick v. Drolson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989