Legal Opinion

Vasek v. Warren Grain & Seed Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1984No. C8-84-207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

Henry and Ronald Vasek, d/b/a Vasek Farms, appeal an order dismissing with prejudice their complaint against Cargill. The Vaseks contend that the trial court could not hold as a matter of law that the statutes of limitations had run and that Gary Hill of Warren Grain was not Car-gill’s agent for service of process on February 22, 1978. We affirm.

FACTS

The Vaseks contracted to sell seed to Warren Grain & Seed. They delivered seed in late 1976 and early 1977. Henry Vasek heard that checks being drawn by Warren Grain were not being paid. He knew of a business relationship…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SpratleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Taylor v. Granite State Provident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. A. Gay Jenson Farms Co. v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Derrick v. Drolson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kociemba v. G.D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
  2. Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API