Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 2005No. 26925Published

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.

Woodrow Anderson (“Appellant”) appeals, pro se from the denial of his “Motion for Reconsideration of Motion to Reinstate Post-Conviction Petition.” We affirm.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of robbery and armed criminal action, and was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to two concurrent twenty year sentences, which were affirmed in State v. Anderson, 953 S.W.2d 646 (Mo.App. S.D.1997). A timely pro se motion for post-conviction relief was filed by Appellant, and court appointed counsel, (“post-conviction counsel”) subsequently filed an amended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ErvinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. State v. OwsleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Winfield v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  5. Anderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API