Hackney v. Dudley
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The amended complaint sufficiently informed the defendant of the place where the collision complained of occurred. Bugg v. Green (Ala. Sup.) 110 So. 718, 1 where all the cases are reviewed. Moreover, the evidence shows that the defendant could not have been prejudiced even had the pleading been technically deficient in this respect.
The defendant’s- testimony shows clearly and conclusively that, although the truck that injured plaintiff was in the custody of Hambright, and was driven and used by him, and that defendant exercised no control over the manner, or the occasions, or the details of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leggett v. . HydeNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Roberts v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Bonfils v. HayesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Perfection Mattress & Spring Co. v. WindhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Peoples v. SeamonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Ellingson v. World Amusement Service Assn. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Southern Metal Treating Co. v. GoodnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.