Miller v. State

GRIFFIS, P. J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Tarvarcus Miller appeals his conviction of sale of a controlled substance. In *201the brief filed by the Office of State Public Defender, Indigent Appeals Division, Miller claims that it was error to allow the testimony of a technical reviewer of the drug-analysis report. Miller also filed a pro se supplemental brief that asserted additional errors. Having reviewed all of the issues submitted, we find no error and affirm.

FACTS

¶ 2. Miller was indicted for the sale of .6 grams of cocaine, which is a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of Mississippi Code…