Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1988No. Appeal No. 1123 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) appeals a Philadelphia Common Pleas Court order granting Harleysville Insurance Company’s (Harleysville) summary judgment motion. We reverse and remand.

Dorothy Ellis was injured when the SEPTA trolley in which she was a passenger collided with two automobiles in Philadelphia. Ellis sought first-party benefits1 under the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (Financial Responsibility Law)2 from Harleysville—insurer of one of the automobiles. Harleysville, in turn, filed a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kuehner Et Ux. v. ParsonsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Farley v. Township of Upper DarbyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Rogers v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson Et Vir v. MiladinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Ellis v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Adams v. Harleysville InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Murray v. ZargerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API