Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 20, 2005No. AC 25331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The petitioner, Angel Luis Ortiz, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas coipus in which he claimed that he had been denied the effective assistance of counsel. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly rejected his claim that his trial attorney had been ineffective for failing to make a showing that the mental condition of a state’s witness had affected her testimonial capacity sufficient to warrant an in camera review of the witness’ medical records. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. State v. BrunoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. State v. MayeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Spivey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ortiz v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Ortiz v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API