DC3 Entertainment, LLC v. John Galt Entertainment, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendants’ (Partial) Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants’ Contract Counterclaims and Third-Party Plaintiff Claims (Dkt. No. 178) (“Pl.’s Mot.”), Defendants’ and Third-Party Claimants’ Opposition (Dkt. No. 226) (“Defs.’ Opp’n”), and Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendants’ Reply in support of their motion (Dkt. No. 232) (“Pl.’s Reply”). The Court has considered all of the papers submitted regarding this motion and determined that oral argument is not necessary. The Court hereby…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Houserman v. Comtech Telecommunications CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
- Peterson v. BestDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023