Twin City Fire Insurance v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

ADJUDICATION

MENCER, District Judge.

The above-captioned case having been tried non-jury, we make the following

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiff, Twin City Fire Insurance Company (hereinafter “Twin City”), is a corporation organized pursuant to the laws of the State of Indiana, which maintains its principal place of business in Connecticut.

2. Defendant, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (hereinafter “Pittsburgh Corning”), maintains its principal place of business at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

3. Twin City, in the course of its business as an insurer, issued to Pittsburgh Corning the following two excess…