Legal Opinion

State Trading Corp. v. Toepfert

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 4, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The decisive question in this case is whether a trade acceptance in the general form of a bill of exchange payable to order "On Aug. 1, 1938,” is rendered nonnegotiable by the addition below the signatures of the drawer and the acceptor of these words, "The obligation of the acceptor hereof arises out of the purchase of goods from the drawer, maturity being in conformity with the original terms of purchase.”

The answer depends upon whether, because of the words quoted, the promise or order to pay contained in the acceptance became conditional or was not to be performed "at a fixed or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Costelo v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. National Bank of Newbury v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Cherry v. SpragueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Taylor v. CurryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Lane Co. v. CrumTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Quality Finance Co. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Ahern v. TowleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Franklin Discount Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953
  4. Stratford Credit Corp. v. GermanoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API