Small v. Oneita Industries
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
In this workers’ compensation action, George Ronald Small sought benefits for on-the-job injuries he sustained while employed by Oneita Industries. The single commissioner denied Small’s claim because, in his application for employment, Small misrepresented his physical condition, and, thus, no employer-employee relationship existed between Small and Oneita Industries. Subsequently, the full commission and the circuit court affirmed the single commissioner. Small appeals. We affirm.
Oneita Industries hired Small in 1990 as a “material handler.” Small’s job consisted of lifting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cooper v. McDevitt & Street Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Chavez v. Lectrosonics, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Haddix v. Day & Night Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Gregg v. HarlleeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1837
3Cited by2 opinions
- Small v. Oneita IndustriesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- O'Hara v. A.D. Jacobson Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995