Legal Opinion

Emery v. Portland Typewriter & Office MacHine

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1987No. 86C-609145; CA A41571PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action under ORS 652.140 1 and ORS 652.150 2 to collect penalty wages. She contends that the trial court erred in finding that defendant’s refusal to pay her was not “wilful.”

We summarize the facts as stated in defendant employer’s brief. Plaintiff worked for defendant as a salesperson from November 18, 1985, until she was discharged on December 18, 1985. On that date, defendant advised her that her wages were available, and she agreed to pick them up and at the same time return certain sales equipment. Plaintiff made no further contact with defendant until January 10,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sabin v. Willamette-Western CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Crofoot v. Columbia-Willamette Air Pollution AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Smurfit Newsprint Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. Davis v. Maxima Integrated ProductsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1999
  4. Wales v. Walt Stallcup EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Girod v. BiggiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API