Legal Opinion
Davis v. Maxima Integrated Products
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 12, 1999No. Civil 98-1258-HUPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubei filed Findings and Recommendation (# 21) on March 5, 1999, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Biggs v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Sabin v. Willamette-Western CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Smith v. BatchelorUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Kling v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cornier v. Paul Tulacz, DVM PCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- McLaughlin v. MurphyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Justin Denley v. Augusta Sportswear, Inc., doing business as Momentec BrandsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- North Marion School District 15 Ex Rel. Trejo v. Acstar InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- North Marion School District 15 Ex Rel. Trejo v. Acstar InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007