Legal Opinion
Attig v. Attig
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 26, 2004No. Nos. 03-051 & 03-062PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. This consolidated appeal arises out of two orders of contempt entered against appellant father in the Washington County Family Court January 2003, finding that father willfully failed to pay child support as ordered. Father claims that the family court lacked jurisdiction, that he was provided with improper notice of hearing regarding both the support enforcement and the contempt proceedings, and that the trial court abused its discretion in issuing the contempt order. We affirm.
¶ 2. The parties, who divorced in Illinois in 1996, had one child, Morgan, prior to their marriage, and two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Russell v. ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Spabile v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
- Sheehan v. RyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Myers v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McDonald v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. MilasinovichDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Pahnke v. PahnkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n/Fidelity New York FSB v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kit (Farrand) Slayton/OCS v. Jeffrey HillSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.