Legal Opinion
Town of Brookfield v. Greenridge, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided November 4, 1977No. File 145736PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeVita, J.
This ease has gone to trial and a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $38,000 on the first count and in the amount of $15,000 on the second count. Subsequently, the defendants filed their notice of appeal. The plaintiff has made an application for a “supplemental prejudgment remedy,” because the amounts presently attached are allegedly insufficient to secure the sum of the judgment. The defendants oppose the application on the grounds that, as defined in General Statutes § 52-278a (d), a prejudgment remedy is one which affects the property of the defendant “prior…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Bahre v. HogbloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- MacK v. SaarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Palverari v. FintaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Town of East Lyme v. WoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Jacques Corp. v. Brown, No. Cv-90-0381618s (Aug. 31, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Caldrello, No. 89-511581 (Feb. 6, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.