Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. South Carolina Power Company

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 21, 1936No. 14339PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chiee Justice Stabrer.

This is an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through destruction by fire of his gin house and its contents. The following facts appear: The building in question, constructed of wooden frame and covered with metal sheeting, was in the town of Gován. Eor a number of years the defendant company furnished Lancaster with electric power and current for the operation of his ginnery and for lighting purposes; The current was conveyed into the building by means of wires extending from the company’s main…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Weeks v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Crosby v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  4. Foster v. City of UnionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  5. Cannon v. Lockhart MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Monongahela Power CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Hiers v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Cooper v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  4. Hunsucker v. State Hwy. Dept.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. Sherrill v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API