Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Lockhart Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 4, 1915No. 9088PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Before Shipp, J., Union, Action by W. A. Cannon against Lockhart Mills. From judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. submit: There was no substantial testimony to establish negligence on the part of the defendant, and a verdict in his favor should have been directed: 6 Thom.

Read the full summary

Before Shipp, J., Union, Action by W. A. Cannon against Lockhart Mills. From judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion. submit: There was no substantial testimony to establish negligence on the part of the defendant, and a verdict in his favor should have been directed: 6 Thom. Neg., sec. 7393; 63 L. R. A. 424; 213 U. S. 7; 87 S. C. 176; lb. 321; 91 S. C. 272; 93 S. C. 73. Degree of care required: Pollock Torts (8th ed.) 41. Proximate cause: 4 Thom. Neg. 3774, 3891; 132 Pa. St. * 626; 19 Atl. 299; 2 Atl. 500; Labatt, Master and Servant, sec. 142; 63 L.…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gage.

Action by a servant against master for injuries to the person; verdict for $1,000.00 actual damages; appeal by defendant.

History: The defendant owns and operates a cotton mill on Broad River; the plaintiff was “a common laborer and operative” therein; in the mill building there are water-closets for the use of operatives; the floor of one of these closets had been taken up to make some repairs; the master mechanic of the mill had the evening before the transaction in issue fastened the door leading out of the main building into the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  4. Pinckney v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sandel v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  2. Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Miller, Administrator v. A.C.L.R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Carter v. Atlantic Coast Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Bunch v. American Cigar Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API