Legal Opinion

United States v. Gage Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 6, 1918No. 1876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 41325. [Oral argument Eeb. 13,1918, by Mr. Hanson.]

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

The merchandise herein is described by the appraiser in his advisory return to the collector as consisting of “millinery ornaments, composed of straw, in the form of leaves and flowers;”. At the hearing before the Board of General Appraisers the examining officer testified the importations “ are all straw made in the form of flowers and ■leaves.” The board, in a brief opinion, states:

The testimony shows that the merchandise consists of straw in its natural condition in the form, of leaves and flowers.

The sample before the court corroborates the foregoing return,' testimony, and finding and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bayersdorfer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. H. Bayersdorfer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
  3. International Forwarding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Cochran Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. United States v. Basket Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  5. Akawa v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API