State v. Murphy
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
This is an appeal from a conviction for housebreaking. We affirm.
Appellant Murphy and one Scott were jointly indicted for housebreaking after being discovered hiding in a small room in the. Fairwold Middle School. Sheriff’s deputies alerted to the scene by a silent burglar alarm found an unlocked exterior door, a partially open window, and an interior door with one pane removed. A soft drink machine had been pried open and another vending machine had been tampered with in the teachers’ lounge.
Several weeks before Murphy’s trial, Scott pled guilty to the housebreaking charge.
At…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HolderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978