Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 1978No. 20674Published

1Opinion of the Court

270 S.C. 642 (1978)

244 S.E.2d 36

The STATE, Respondent,

v.

Izell MURPHY, Appellant.

20674

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

May 2, 1978.

Asst. Public Defender David I. Bruck, Columbia, for appellant.

Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod, Asst. Attys. Gen. Brian P. Gibbes and Edward B. Latimer and Sol. James C. Anders, Columbia, for respondent.

May 2, 1978.

NESS, Justice:

This is an appeal from a conviction for housebreaking. We affirm.

Appellant Murphy and one Scott were jointly indicted for housebreaking after being discovered hiding in a small room in the Fairwold Middle School. Sheriff's deputies alerted to the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. RobertsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. State v. KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API