Legal Opinion
Patten v. Dennis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1943No. 10265PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal of an action brought by appellant.
It is impossible to tell what appellant claims is his cause of action. By piecing together various petitions and motions, and other matters, it appears that prior to December 21, 1940, appellant was a “Classified Laborer at the Puget Sound Navy Yard”. He alleges that on or about the date mentioned, Smith, Bogard and Larsen, entered into a conspiracy to violate 18 U.S. C.A. §§ 51 and 126, with intent “to injure the right of” appellant by preventing appellant “from carrying through a request…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. McIntireCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Humboldt Lovelock Irr. Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by14 opinions
- Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Gold Seal Co. v. Weeks, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Daves v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1953
- City of Phoenix v. MullenArizona Supreme Court · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.