Legal Opinion

Consolidated Mining & Prospecting Co. v. Huff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 5, 1901No. 11,789PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Cherokee district court; A. H. Skid-more, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, C. J. :

This was an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to compel the issuance and delivery of certain shares of stock in the defendant corporation, or in the alternative for their value. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in the words following :

“It is therefore considered, ordered, adjudged and decreed by the court, that this plaintiff have issued and delivered to him by the defendant herein, The Consolidated Mining and Prospecting Company, twenty-four thousand shares of stock, of the par value of one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Telegraph Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Strickland v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Strickland v. . CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Yurann v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Dodd v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Brought v. MinorArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Kinard v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. In Re BiaggiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API