Legal Opinion

Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Autotransformation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment unanimously modified in accord*1130anee with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on its first and third causes of action. The defendants Albert Tantalo and Kathy Tantalo appeal from the order and from the judgment entered thereon. The judgment on plaintiffs first cause of action was entered solely against the defendant Auto transformation, Inc., which has not appeared in the action and is in default. No argument is made for reversal on behalf of that corporation. Plaintiffs third…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WesolowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Blake v. GardinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sinhogar v. ParryNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tilden Financial Corp. v. MuffolettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API