Protest Upon the Worker's Compensation Claim of Rose v. Westates Construction Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Chief Justice.
The primary issue presented in this case is whether the district court properly applied the “odd-lot doctrine” under the Wyoming worker’s compensation statute in denying a claim for permanent total disability. There is a corollary question with respect to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the district court’s award of a permanent partial disability of twenty percent. We affirm the award entered by the district court.
The appellant, Kenneth C. Rose, states the issues to be dealt with as follows:
“L
“AS A MATTER OF LAW, THE APPELLANT IS NOT PRECLUDED FROM RECEIVING…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pacific Power and Light v. ParsonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- McCarty v. Bear Creek Uranium Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Schepanovich v. United States Steel Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. ColvinWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Big Horn County v. IlesWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Workers' Compensation Claim of Moss v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Matter of Injury to CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- City of Casper v. BowdishWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Tyler L. Stallman v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.