Legal Opinion

Protest Upon the Worker's Compensation Claim of Rose v. Westates Construction Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1985No. 83-211PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

The primary issue presented in this case is whether the district court properly applied the “odd-lot doctrine” under the Wyoming worker’s compensation statute in denying a claim for permanent total disability. There is a corollary question with respect to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the district court’s award of a permanent partial disability of twenty percent. We affirm the award entered by the district court.

The appellant, Kenneth C. Rose, states the issues to be dealt with as follows:

“L
“AS A MATTER OF LAW, THE APPELLANT IS NOT PRECLUDED FROM RECEIVING…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pacific Power and Light v. ParsonsWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  2. McCarty v. Bear Creek Uranium Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schepanovich v. United States Steel Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. ColvinWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Big Horn County v. IlesWyoming Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Workers' Compensation Claim of Moss v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Matter of Injury to CarpenterWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. City of Casper v. BowdishWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Tyler L. Stallman v. State of Wyoming ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API