Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Brynes
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 21, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtEdward S. Silver, J.
These are motions addressed to the report of the Referee. He has recommended a finding based on the evidence adduced before him that the intestate’s husband is entitled to his distributive share of the estate.
The administrator, decedent’s nephew, sought a determination that the husband was not entitled to a share of the estate because he had failed to provide for her and had abandoned her. Citation was published addressed to the absentee husband, if living, and if dead to his legal representatives, etc., tendering the issues of failure to support and abandonment. The husband failed to appear…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Noseworthy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Amend v. HurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Boyd v. BoydNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Williams v. AlexanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nussbaum v. FishmanCivil Court of the City of New York · 1972