Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2004No. ED 83175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

The State of Missouri (“State”) appeals from a judgment granting Nathan Walker’s (“Defendant”) motion for a mistrial with prejudice. State asserts the trial court erred in granting Defendant a mistrial with prejudice, rather than a mistrial, when one victim invoked her Fifth Amendment1 right not to testify. State argues double jeopardy did not attach and retrial should not be prohibited in that the prosecutor did not intend to provoke a mistrial. We agree and reverse and remand.

Defendant was charged with one count of domestic assault in the second degree and one count…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. State v. TolliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. WrenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. State v. CloverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rancho La Valencia, Inc. and Charles R. Randy Turner v. Aquaplex, Inc. and James Edward Jones, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  2. Vincente Dominique Chavez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API