Legal Opinion

Elgar v. National Continental/Progressive Insurance

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 4, 2004No. 2003-554-AppealPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Supreme Court on April 7, 2004, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised on appeal should not summarily be decided. The plaintiff, Lisa M. Elgar (plaintiff or Elgar), appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendants, National Continental/Progressive Insurance Company' (National) and Geico Casualty Insurance Company (Geico or collectively defendants), denying her request that defendants compensate her for injuries she suffered as a result of an assault by customers of the taxi she was driving. 1…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Lending Corp. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  2. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. OlivierSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  3. Carlson v. Town of SmithfieldSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Valdes v. SmalleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Bowen Court Associates v. Ernst & Young, LLPSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeSantis v. PrelleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  2. Narragansett Improvement Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. Le v. VakninSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. Trang Le, As Mother And Next Friend Of Amanda Le, A Minor, And Trang Le Vs. Yaacov Vaknin And American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API