Legal Opinion
Lebeau v. United States
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 29, 2000No. Civ. 99-4106PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS
PIERSOL, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court are motions to intervene and to dismiss filed by The Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe, the Spirit Lake Tribe and the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Council of the Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes (collectively referred to herein as “the Tribes”). (Docs.ll, 12.) Plaintiffs and the defendant filed briefs in response to the motions to intervene and dismiss and the Tribes filed a reply brief. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the Tribes’ motion to intervene for the sole purpose of seeking dismissal of this…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hodel v. IrvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas v. Bruce Babbitt, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Citizens against Casino Gambling v. KempthorneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- CITIZENS AGAIST CAS. GAM., ERIE CTY. v. KempthorneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- LeBeau v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2002
- LeBeau v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2004
- Loudner v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.